The acting categories at
any awards show, I feel, are generally the most anticipated. People love to see
an actor or actress they love be awarded the best in whatever category they
were nominated and for whatever award they are winning, just to justify their
love for that actor/actress. I cover the acting categories pretty heavily,
because they are the most anticipated, next to, of course, Best Picture. This
year the movies and performances that are getting Oscar attention seem to be
pretty stellar, and with critics being so divided it makes for quite a race and
competition. In one of my first posts I made the comment that Best Actress is
generally my favorite category, but because it seems that the nominees seem
pretty locked in, it kind of makes for a slightly boring race; I feel the same
for Best Actor. The supporting acting categories are unpredictable and up in
the air, which makes for fun categories to discuss and predict. As I have
already discussed Best Supporting Actor, it is now time to put the spotlight on
Best Supporting Actress.
Fun fact: the shortest ever Oscar winning performance was Beatrice Straight's win for Best Supporting Actress for her role in Network; her screen time was 5 minutes and 2 seconds. Also, the shortest ever Oscar nominated performance was from Hermione Baddeley for Room at the Top in the Best Supporting Actress category; her screen time was 2 minutes and 19 seconds. These two little fun facts show that for this category, that is, for the supporting actress, you do not have to do as much work as the supporting actor to win or be nominated. To get recognized for such a short length, you better come in and give a fierce performance, ala Beatrice Straight style. This year the supporting actresses, with obvious varying degrees of screen time, give some of what I think to be the best acting of the year; but that is without having seen them all. So here are the women to pay attention to; they are ranked in order of likelihood of nomination:
Fun fact: the shortest ever Oscar winning performance was Beatrice Straight's win for Best Supporting Actress for her role in Network; her screen time was 5 minutes and 2 seconds. Also, the shortest ever Oscar nominated performance was from Hermione Baddeley for Room at the Top in the Best Supporting Actress category; her screen time was 2 minutes and 19 seconds. These two little fun facts show that for this category, that is, for the supporting actress, you do not have to do as much work as the supporting actor to win or be nominated. To get recognized for such a short length, you better come in and give a fierce performance, ala Beatrice Straight style. This year the supporting actresses, with obvious varying degrees of screen time, give some of what I think to be the best acting of the year; but that is without having seen them all. So here are the women to pay attention to; they are ranked in order of likelihood of nomination:
- Lupita Nyong'o, 12 Years a Slave. She has already won
the Los Angeles Film Critics Association award and has been nominated for
other critics awards for her role as Patsy. She plays a victim of rape and
several beatings as the slave that her evil master, played by Michael
Fassbender, is in love with. She picks 500 pounds of cotton a day, more
than any man, but is tortured by her master’s wife, played by Sarah
Paulson. This is Nyong'o's film debut, and boy does she knock it out of
the park. She does not have a whole lot of screen time; in fact, you do
not even see her until the half way point of the film. In her less than 15
minutes on screen, she gives one of the most important and memorable
performances of the year. It took me a long time after seeing the film to
decide if I want to root for her all the way to the Oscar, but I need to
see the rest of the buzzed about performances before I do so, but as of
now, she is my choice to win this category. Nyong'o's impeccable
powerhouse acting is ingrained in my memory, and without it, I am not so sure
the movie would be as talked about and praised. That is what a great
supporting performance is supposed to do.
- June Squibb, Nebraska. At the age of 84, you would
assume an actress at that age would have quite the filmography, but sadly
June Squibb has been very much over looked. She has had small roles on
film and television since 1990, but she managed to find success on
Broadway in the 60’s. This year June Squibb finally was able to break out
into full stardom by playing the snappy wife of, and the raved about
performance by, Bruce Dern. June won the Boston Film Critics Association
award and has been nominated at many other critics’ awards, and it is
unlikely that the love of her performance will stop anytime soon. I fully
expect to see her nominated at the Oscars, and maybe if her love grows,
she could possibly win. I have not seen her performance, though I am
desperately waiting too!
- Jennifer Lawrence, American Hustle. Talk about someone
who is loved by many, Jennifer Lawrence just cannot be forgotten. At first,
American Hustle started to just be a so-so movie, with only raves for
Lawrence, then all of a sudden the movie started popping up on almost
every top 10 list and is winning many critics’ awards. Everyone, probably
Lawrence included, was surprised win she won the New York Film Critics
Circle award last week, taking down all the top supporting actress
contenders. She plays the emotionally fragile wife of Christian Bale, and
so far she is the biggest stand out performance from the movie. Last year
she won the Lead Actress Oscar, and this will be the first time that a
Lead Actress winner steps down to the Supporting Actress category the year
after winning. She has the love of everyone in Hollywood and pretty much
the world right now, and that has to be factored in somewhere. If she
starts winning the big awards, do not be surprised, because I believe with
her love and popularity alone, she could easily win the Oscar.
- Oprah Winfrey, The Butler. I will try to be nice here.
I very much disliked The Butler, and I tried to like it and I was even
excited to see it. My thought before seeing it was, I know that Oprah can
act, so this movie will hopefully be great. As it turned out, it became a
political vehicle for African Americans to praise Obama. That did not
settle well with me, because it made every white president look racist,
and Ronald Reagan was quite the opposite. So the whole film left me
feeling annoyed. Back to Oprah, side note- I personally thought she
deserved to win the Supporting Actress Oscar for The Color Purple back in
1985- I found her performance in The Butler to be the only thing that I
can say I somewhat liked from the movie. My thinking though is this, if we
took Oprah out of that role and stuck someone else in, would this
performance even be considered for an Oscar? I honestly do not think
so. I think this movie is also a vehicle to get Oprah an Oscar. Is she
worthy to be nominated, after a lot of thought, I will say yes; But, I
would also be okay with her performance being left out of nominations as
well. She has not received any critics love, but that is because most
critics hated the movie or just thought it to be mediocre. I expect her to
be nominated at the Oscars, because I know Oprah has the love of people
and she has Harvey Weinstein, Oscar campaign God, who no doubt will get
her nominated. If she wins, all I can say is, I am not sure if I will be
in rage mode or not. Let’s just hope she does not win.
- Octavia Spencer, Fruitvale Station. I was very
conflicted about putting her in front of a couple other contenders, but
she won the National Board of Review for supporting actress, so she has
some critics’ love. I personally am most baffled by the love and high
praise for this movie and performance. I think it is the most overrated
movie, along with The Butler, this year. I do not understand. Like Oprah,
if there has to be a spotlight from the movie, then Octavia is the one to
cast it on. I love Octavia, and I was very happy when she won this
category two years ago for her performance in The Help. In this movie, she
plays the religious mother of a gunshot victim from police brutality in a
true story. Spencer has little screen time, but with what little she has,
she manages to be effective and memorable. I am not so sure if she will be
nominated come Oscar time and I cannot say if I feel she is worthy or not.
Her few scenes are great, but not having seen all the other contenders, I cannot
help but think there has to be more worthy supporting actresses. Her love
is based on the critics who have loved the film, but will the love be as
strong within the bigger and more prestigious voting bodies? She will have
to fight to be nominated, but I would not be surprised or upset to see her
left off the big award nominations.
- Julia Roberts, August: Osage County. Julia Roberts use
to be America's sweetheart, and well loved by The Academy, but she has
taken a back seat in the film world to be a mother and a wife, and I feel
this is her comeback. A few months back there was a bunch of heat
surrounding the movie, because the studio that is running the awards
campaign kept going back and forth on where to place Meryl Streep and
Julia Roberts. They went back and forth regarding co-leads, Meryl
supporting and Julia leading, and settling at Meryl leading and Julia
supporting. Many people, having seen the film, have also had mixed
reactions on their category placement, but Julia is being campaigned in
supporting with Meryl leading, but The Academy can choose to place them in
whatever category they feel. Some have even said Julia's performance is
superior to Meryl Streep's, which is saying something. The movie centers
on Julia Robert's character journeying home to attend the funeral of her
father and visiting with her dysfunctional family. Julia has not received
any critics’ love, but that is because the movie has received mixed
reviews with people praising only the performances. It is an ensemble
movie, and those generally do not fare well with critics. I personally think,
this is without having seen the film, that Julia will be nominated at the
Oscars. I would love to see her nominated, and I honestly cannot wait to
see the film.
- Margo Martindale, August: Osage County. Margo has not
had big roles in movies, but has managed to have lots of supporting roles
in film and most prominently in television. She too is being praised for
her supporting work in August: Osage County with Julia and Meryl. It is
not unheard for there to be double nominees from the same movie, but more
often than not it can divide voters and split votes for a nomination and
for a win. I have never disliked a performance by Margo, so I am happy to
see her being recognized, but I would hate to be under the shadow of Julia
Roberts. We will see how she shines, and if she can manage to shine
brighter than Julia and pick up a nomination, with or without her.
The next few ladies are the
spoilers, who could possible come along and knock one of the above ladies down:
- Sally Hawkins, Blue Jasmine. I have not seen this
movie, nor am I acquainted with Hawkins’ body of work, but from many
people, she gives a memorable performance from a movie that is being
heavily praised for Cate Blanchett's performance. I am not sure if she is
worthy or not, but some people consider her to be a dark horse for a
nomination. All I know is props to her for, not only acting against what
is being said to be the performance of the year with Cate, but also if she
knocks down the tough competitors for a nomination.
- Carey Mulligan, Inside Llewyn Davis. The movie is well
loved by critics, but so far no big stand out performance love. Many
people think John Goodman can finally get a nomination for his supporting
work in the film, and others think Carey could too. But, I am not so sure.
I have not seen the movie, but I know Carey is a fantastic actress and a
scene stealer, which is why she makes the list. Either way, nomination or
not, I will likely love her performance as I have loved all of her
others.
- Emily Watson, The Book Thief. The Book Thief is said to
be a dark, dark horse for nominations, like Extremely Loud and Incredibly
Close turned out to be. The movie has been singled out for its
performances for Watson and her co-star Geoffrey Rush. Emily has gotten a
couple other nominations in the past, so she is loved by The Academy, and
just maybe she could be a spoiler to the other likely contenders.
- Jennifer Garner, Dallas Buyers Club. I got the chance
to see Dallas Buyers Club last week, and the performances throughout the
entire movie were outstanding. The only weak link I would say would be Jennifer.
I love the woman, she seems to be one of the most genuinely kind and real
people in Hollywood. Last year, she rode the awards ride with her famously
snubbed, in the directing category, husband Ben Affleck while he won every
Best Picture award there was. This year, Affleck could be following her,
but because she is outshined by her co-stars, and because the competition
is pretty stiff, I am not so sure it is that likely. Stranger things have
happened when it comes to people being forgotten everywhere else and
become randomly nominated at the Oscars, it has happened before, and it
could certainly happen again. I think she deserves a spot on this list,
but I do not think she will make it much further than this.
The Supporting Actress race is one
with no consensus winner in sight, but one with a lot of love behind multiple
different women. Who knows how it will shape up, but Wednesday and Thursday,
with SAG and Golden Globe nominations, we will find out who to look out for. I
think the final 5 nominees at the Oscars are on this list, but right now,
anything can happen. I hope no consensus will be found, so then we have
surprise winners and nominations throughout the award season! Look back later
this week to see who gets nominated at the big awards, and share who you think
will be nominated!
No comments:
Post a Comment